<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Titans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dctheatrescene.com/2008/07/22/the-titans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dctheatrescene.com/2008/07/22/the-titans/</link>
	<description>Washington DC&#039;s Liveliest Theater Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:48:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://dctheatrescene.com/2008/07/22/the-titans/comment-page-1/#comment-4172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dctheatrescene.com/?p=1789#comment-4172</guid>
		<description>The contrast between this review and Nelson Pressley&#039;s in the Post today couldn&#039;t be more stark. Of special interest to me is Pressley&#039;s comment that theater-goers who are not familiar with the facts and events of the Cuban Missile Crisis should &quot;hustle to see the show,&quot; implying that most people ARE so fully versed in the story that the play holds no surprises. Really? I lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis, read &quot;Thirteen Days&quot; in college and saw the TV movie, and I didn&#039;t know a lot of what happens in the play, especially from the Russian side. Neither did the cast, the production team, and about 90% of the audience so far. The theory that a straight version of a historical event requires fictionalizing to make it compelling is really anti-history, and has led to such abominations as Billy Zane chasing Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet around the Titanic while it&#039;s sinking, as if the facts of the tragedy weren&#039;t dramatic enough. I may be a sap, but to me, the prospect of nuclear holocaust is enough to keep me interested, even though I know how it turned out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contrast between this review and Nelson Pressley&#8217;s in the Post today couldn&#8217;t be more stark. Of special interest to me is Pressley&#8217;s comment that theater-goers who are not familiar with the facts and events of the Cuban Missile Crisis should &#8220;hustle to see the show,&#8221; implying that most people ARE so fully versed in the story that the play holds no surprises. Really? I lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis, read &#8220;Thirteen Days&#8221; in college and saw the TV movie, and I didn&#8217;t know a lot of what happens in the play, especially from the Russian side. Neither did the cast, the production team, and about 90% of the audience so far. The theory that a straight version of a historical event requires fictionalizing to make it compelling is really anti-history, and has led to such abominations as Billy Zane chasing Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet around the Titanic while it&#8217;s sinking, as if the facts of the tragedy weren&#8217;t dramatic enough. I may be a sap, but to me, the prospect of nuclear holocaust is enough to keep me interested, even though I know how it turned out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
