<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Days of Rain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dctheatrescene.com/2009/11/02/three-days-of-rain-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dctheatrescene.com/2009/11/02/three-days-of-rain-2/</link>
	<description>Washington DC&#039;s Liveliest Theater Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernie Joselovitz</title>
		<link>http://dctheatrescene.com/2009/11/02/three-days-of-rain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie Joselovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dctheatrescene.com/?p=10682#comment-10423</guid>
		<description>While I admire the clarity of your retelling the story of the play as it&#039;s staged, and the limitations you&#039;ve imposed for the audience&#039;s sake, I think you missed the point or, more likely, underestimated the fuller texture of it.  That becomes evident, it seems to me, in declaring a &quot;happy ending&quot;, which depends on what is at stake, and what is resolved.  The irony that much is NOT may be the more significant point of the play.  It&#039;s not your fault, that this did not resonate with you.  It did, upon reading it, with me.
Hey, Tim, you&#039;re great!
Ernie Jos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I admire the clarity of your retelling the story of the play as it&#8217;s staged, and the limitations you&#8217;ve imposed for the audience&#8217;s sake, I think you missed the point or, more likely, underestimated the fuller texture of it.  That becomes evident, it seems to me, in declaring a &#8220;happy ending&#8221;, which depends on what is at stake, and what is resolved.  The irony that much is NOT may be the more significant point of the play.  It&#8217;s not your fault, that this did not resonate with you.  It did, upon reading it, with me.<br />
Hey, Tim, you&#8217;re great!<br />
Ernie Jos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

