
(l-r) Cody Nickell as Karl Lindner, Kimberly Gilbert as Betsy, Jennifer Mendenhall as Bev, Jefferson Russell as Al and Dawn Ursula as Francine (Photo: Stan Barouh)
It’s Neapolitan – America’s bastardized version of spumoni – and Bev doesn’t buy Russ’ explanation that it’s derived from the Napoli culture. “I figure it’s ‘neo’, which means ‘new’, and ‘politan’, which indicates a city. A new city,” she says. And how clever playwright Bruce Norris is to relate his post-racial discussion to a frozen dessert within the first five minutes of his newest play Clybourne Park, which runs at Woolly Mammoth Theatre until April 11th.
Words – the ones we say, don’t say, replace, and avoid – are the crux of Norris’ most recent endeavor to challenge his audiences’ perceptions on race relations. The show, directed by Woolly artistic director Howard Shalwitz, is a curious extension of Lorraine Hansberry’s prized A Raisin in the Sun, which prefaces the frayed Younger family’s move into the predominately-white Clybourne Park neighborhood. Russ (Mitchell Hébert) and Bev (Jennifer Mendenhall) have decided to pack up and move after the tragic suicide of their son Kenneth – a Korean war vet whose war crimes led to a scarlet letter from the townsfolk.
Yet the neighbors cannot stop fueling their loss, with visits from pastor Jim (Michael Glenn) and the timid yet unintentionally abrasive Karl Lindner (Cody Nickell) – serving as an addendum to Hansberry’s play. – and his deaf wife (Kimberly Gilbert). Karl makes Russ, still silently grieving, aware that the next inhabitants are a black family. Arguing that their entrance to the community will start an uprising, the young overly-verbose husband begins to deflect any semblance of acceptance into an economic discussion. Meanwhile, the family’s black maid Francine (Dawn Ursula) and her husband Al (Jefferson Russell) are gratingly dragged into the conversation, dealing with the ramifications of the intolerant (Karl’s thoughtless semantics), the histrionic (Bev’s constant “connections” to Francine’s work), and the apathetic (Russ’ sorrow drowning out all reason.)
2009. The same house has been dismantled in the second act and has been purchased by a white family who plan to demolish it. Woolly set designer James Kronzer’s marked delineation of the aging house must be recognized for its verisimilitude. Reminding me of August: Osage County‘s three-tiered habitat, the house at 406 Clybourne Street holds weight as an overarching theme – things really haven’t changed under that roof.
Yuppie couple Steve and Lindsey (Nickell and Gilbert) defend their plans for the new architecture to protesting members of the neighborhood – black couple Kevin and Lena’s (Russell and Ursula). Herein begins a whirlwind of racial crises, starting with the swapping of offensive jokes to their eventual deconstruction – and destruction. But while Norris’ writing remains steadily acerbic throughout, the second act begins to cushion itself with the very same political correctness it targets. The topics of double-standards are raised, but are occasionally drowned out by laughter. This isn’t indicative of Clybourne being a pointless experiment, since Norris’ first act dominates with focus and fearlessness. Maybe the second act’s cringing tendency is just another sign of the times, proving that there is no easy discourse on race. Either way, Shalwitz’s seamless blend of comfort-crushing comedy and Chayefsky-esque performances make for another unique production in Woolly’s constantly challenging history.
Cody Nickell’s performances as Lindner and Steve have neurotic touches, reminding me of Michael Stuhlbarg – his lines loop over each other, distinct and self-assured, yet grounded in egotism. Jennifer Mendenhall’s Bev is a colorful dingbat, a disaffected June Cleaver, whose performance colors the mood of the first act. Yet her turn as ignorant pseudo-feminist Kathy in the second act falls somewhat flat, leaving the actress with cartoonish behavior and predictable puns. Eclipsed‘s Dawn Ursula plays it cool, and both her Francine and Lena maintain a cocksure attitude regarding the ignorance that surrounds them. Jeff Russell’s facial expressions have the ability to draw attention from alert audience members, while his comic timing remains on point. Mitchell Hébert’s overwhelming first act leaves the audience wishing for more after intermission, but we’re treated to him giving a brief comic turn instead – there’s a boatload of tenacity in his performance, making it a standout.
Again, Norris’ Clybourne is a tricky production to stage, as is any work regarding the topic of race. Every audience will expect something to walk away with, whether that be an intelligent analysis, a witty anecdote, or even an answer. But Norris conquers with laughter, and while it trips occasionally on its own path, the show enlightens with its obscurity. The final few minutes may trigger differing opinions from the audience, but as Bev exits the stage remarking that “things are going to change real soon,” it becomes clear that the truth is not really funny at all.
Clybourne Park
by Bruce Norris
directed by Howard Shalwitz
presented by Woolly Mammoth Theatre
reviewed by Phil Calabro
Clybourne Park closes April 11th, 2010.
Reviews:
- Chris Klimek . Washington City Paper
- Charles R. Larson . CounterPunch
- Peter Marks . The Post
- Barbara MacKay . DCExaminer













This is the worst review I’ve ever read. How can I trust a site like DC Theatre Scene when they give a lukewarm review to a genius show like Clybourne Park, but send praises to the messes over at Toby’s Amateur Show Hour? Hire a reviewer with training and logical thought, please.
I have to agree and find this a bit hard to follow.
I thought it is a perfectly well written review.
Did you see the Hairspray at Toby’s and not like it? If not, you should not be attacking a show you didn’t see. Toby’s so-called “amateur” shows have won several Helen Hayes Awards. I saw HAIRSPRAY last Friday, and it’s one of the best musical productions I have seen all year. Disagreeing with this review of Clybourne Park is fine, but attacking a production you haven’t seen is quite unfair.
I saw Clybourne Park last week and was deeply impressed with both the playwright’s work and the production. I believe the key to understanding and appreciating the play is that it’s not just about race, but about how we talk about race and other difficult issues. Both the insensitive and condescending discussions in 1959 and the awkward politically correct discussions in 2009 ring true to life and each funny in their own way. The breakdown of communication in the second act (which reminds me of the Tony-winning “God of Carnage”) is a reflection of the increasing incivility in today’s popular discourse.
Putting aside all of the pretentious talk, Act One was both powerful and funny, and Act Two almost had me rolling in the aisles. This cast gives one of the best all around performances I’ve seen this year. I highly recommend this play. Don’t make the mistake of thinking that because race is one of the themes that the play is serious and dreary. I enjoyed this production immensely.
I agree with Mr. McKnight. This was one of the best productions I’ve seen in a good long time! I laughed until I cried; but I also left the theater with a lot to think about. Clybourne Park does what ALL theatre should be doing – opening up a dialogue about issues that we, as a society, otherwise try to ignore. Well done Woolly Mammoth, cast & crew!! Go see this and decide for yourself!
I am a big fan of the show, it’s great to see so many points of view here!
I have to agree that, among other things, referencing Chayefsky and Stuhlbarg contribute to a review that strains to be erudite rather than concise or compelling. Also, I have no idea who either of these people are! But it’s great to be part of a lively discussion about the show here online.
Yup, I gotta agree – the above review is convoluted and reveals either the author’s inexperience or a real lack of discernment. Either way, go see this show. And listen to the play. (Saw it in NY and DC.) Despite some rather ham-fisted direction (tending toward sitcom comedy, petulance instead of anguish and sluggish pacing) this is a gem of a play: smart, hilariously observed and quite heartbreaking.
Highly recommend.
Dawn Ursula is awesome! I’m coming to see this next week – can’t wait!
Saw this opening weekend. Excellent cast. Hilarious dialogue. Relevant subject matter. I laughed till my face hurt. And I left with a lot to think about. A great show.
All of the previous commenter’s who questioned the reviewers bonafides and insightfulness are outright white guilt idiots. This play is not a “gem” or anything near it that has a shine to it. It is a vapid work that has ascended to the highest reaches of the theater world due to the exploitive nature and tendency of white liberals to shine up manure that deals with race in “easy ways that the can understand” and justly call it gold.
This play is as embarrasing to white people as Tyler Perry is to black people.