Playwright Robert O’Hara’s Insurrection: Holding History was one of the most intriguing and provocative shows we saw last year. Can Woolly Mammoth’s production of his new work, Antebellum, hold a candle to it? A candle? My God! It can hold the whole burning city of Atlanta to it!
“Antebellum” means “before the war,” but it is not the war you are thinking about. Like Insurrection, Antebellum begins with two stories in two distinct venues. The first is in Atlanta, in the plantation home of Sarah and Ariel Roca (Jenna Sokolowski and Nick Vienna), on the eve of Gone with the Wind’s first showing in 1939. A mysterious African-American woman (Jessica Frances Dukes) arrives, ostensibly looking for work. This story at first seems to be a madcap comedy, of the kind not seen since I Love Lucy went off the air. Sokolowski seems a little over-the-top until you realize that it’s her character, not her, who is so extreme. (“Folks called me Simple Sarah since I was nothing but a tot,” Sarah says. “I use to like to touch hot things…”) Simple Sarah is in rapture waiting for the arrival of a dress she designed herself – a red and yellow concoction which looks like a bowl of mustard-and-catsup soup. She will wear it to the movie opening.
The other story is as serious as cancer: the quarters of Nazi Commandant Oskar von Schleicher (Andrew Price), where he keeps the source of his rapture, Black musician Gabriel Gift (Carlton Byrd). Gabriel is three times cursed under Nazi law: as a homosexual; as a Black musician (and purveyor of the “degenerate African” music, jazz); and as someone who, in the past, loved a Jew. Only von Schleicher’s violent, impassioned, eroticized love keeps Gabriel safe.
These two plots merge in a way which is astonishing, horrifying and ultimately heartbreaking. But O’Hara’s larger theme is equally heartbreaking. It is this: while we took the side of right in the Second War, the difference between the Nazis and us was one of degree, not kind. Of course, the Nazis made the extermination of Jews state policy, and organized death camps for that purpose. But Americans lynched Blacks – and in the memorable case of Leo Frank, a Jew – for generations, with little interference from the government. Kristallnacht is infamous as the German pogrom which foreshadowed the Nazi’s final solution. But what about the burning and razing of African-American neighborhoods in Florida and elsewhere in the early part of the twentieth century? Were these not our own pogroms? And while this obviously postdated the setting of the play, did you happen to catch the Little Rock pictures during the fifty-year anniversary of the forced integration of their schools? Did you notice the white crowds, howling and cursing as they chased after the kids? Couldn’t they have been incipient Nazis, just waiting for an American Hitler to make them goose-step and kill?
It is this hard truth which makes the opening of Gone with the Wind such a canny setting for the American portion of O’Hara’s play. The Margaret Mitchell novel, and subsequent Vivian Leigh-Clark Gable movie, was a massive, and largely successful, effort to paper over history. In this false, flawed version of the past, slaves were happy, grateful and loved members of their masters’ households; slaveholding whites were responsible, churchgoing folks who were just trying to hold together their way of life; and the Civil War was a great tragedy and injustice to the South. It is no wonder that the people of Atlanta were excited by the movie and its premiere in their city. It allowed them to substitute a happy fantasy for the guilt and shame which was their proper heritage. It was a fantasy which much of America held on to for nearly thirty years.
I cannot tell you how this plot develops without ruining it for you. Suffice it to say that there is a grim explanation for Simple Sarah’s behavior, and that if you have the stomach for honest talk, delivered bluntly, you will find this story moving and compelling. There are some astonishing developments which a lesser cast might have difficulty delivering convincingly, but there is not a moment in this production which is not absolutely authentic, and absolutely satisfying.
The entire cast does beautiful work, but Price gives a towering performance. His character is a typical bullying, spittle-flecked Nazi with a little bit of power, and he is as likely to slap Gabriel as he is to kiss his buttocks (he does both in the play). But he makes this tormented man sympathetic. His love for Gabriel is genuine, and the contradictions in his character – high-booted, sieg-heiling Nazi, hypermasculine hyper-aryan, gay man, lover of jazz, lover of poetry, lover of Gabriel – turn him into a human volcano, and Oskar, amazingly, is everything at once and still an authentic human character. Even when he is on stage naked – as he is for several moments in the play – Price is completely natural and unselfconscious.
Director Chay Yew’s work is also superb, as are the show’s technical aspects. Yew brilliantly intercuts scenes between the two stories, so that the characters from both stories briefly share the stage, and look past, through, and ultimately at each other in ways which unmistakably underscore the play’s core truths. Tony Cisek’s movable set- in particular, his invocation of a foggy haunted Georgia pine forest is brilliant. Valerie St. Pierre Smith’s costumes, and particularly Sarah’s preposterous dress, are great successes. Colin K. Bills’ lighting design, which marks the hour with unerring precision, is wonderful. There are some uncredited special effects at the end of the show which are as good as I’ve seen in Washington. Overall, Paul Bradley served as technical director with distinction.
Let me go further than that: Antebellum is the best thing I have ever seen on the Woolly Mammoth stage. Given the company’s distinguished history, that’s saying a lot.
Antebellum
by Robert O’Hara
directed by Chay Yew
produced by Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company
reviewed by Tim Treanor
Photos: Stan Barouh
For Details, Directions and Tickets, click here.
I am still reeling. See this play. It is heartbreaking with no remorse. The only hope is that love can exist even in the ashes. Disregard all of the other condemnations and just see it for yourself and form your own opinions. Art doesn’t have to subscribe to history for its justifications. Sometimes only the heart counts.
chris —
with all due respect, the woolly website for the show prominently features a warning:
appropriate for ages 16 and up
(contains nudity and sexual situations)
a placard in the theater also warns that the production includes smoking, gunshots and nudity.
i’m sure woolly will have no problem finding a taker of your “season pass” from among the hundreds of patrons at each of the packed houses who have lauded this production.
good luck with your future viewing endeavors.
I went to see Antibellum at Woolly last night. For me one of the reasons to go the theater is that once in a great while you get to see a show that just knocks you off your feet. For me Antibellum is one of those shows. Wow! I highly recommend seeing this show!
I’ve been thinking hard about how to review Antebellum. Critiquing the story is very difficult, when I wouldn’t have chosen to attend if I had been aware of the content. No one wants to give ratings to theater or art, but there needs somewhere to be a warning that this play contains strong sexual content, full male nudity, extreme violence, drug use, and strong language. Not only does it have these elements, but it combines them together in very graphic and disturbing means. I guess if all that the author was trying to accomplish was to be disturbing, then the story was a success. But, it’s a weak success because I wouldn’t have chosen to attend or to recommend it to anyone.
I’ve also got to question Woolly Mammoth’s choice in showing this when they are seeking season pass members for next year. Reading next years list of plays, it appears to me that I have no way of avoiding another one like this. I won’t be renewing my season pass and will have to make choices play by play.
Your contention that American and German attitudes were or are parallels is contentious. A matter of degree or nature is an important distinction that deserves some discussion. When a state adopts a policy to take action, then a difference in kind is established with any state that does not adopt such policy. And it is not comparable to a state that does not or cannot control the action of its constituents who harbor other ideas.
Had there been a theatrical time warp, and the play were set in the 1850’s old south and the 1930’s Germany, the parallels would have been less contentious, perhaps more a matter of degree. I think we can come away from the play and appreciate that, too. That there were Jewish and black slave owners of that era, would only confuse the sentiments and complicate the guilts. The play Antebellum in that context loses its oomph.
The actions of Americans in Little Rock (and others you mention) in the 20th century were not sanctioned by the state and not pogroms.
The comparisons between the two cultures in the 30’s is legitimate comparison because they were contemporaneous, but the story makes connections that maybe would not exist otherwise. Similarities in culture are interesting, but, no, they are never the quite same comparison that you suggest. The connection in the play Antebellum is artistic, it is powerful, maybe important. It isn’t intended to re-write history as much as it forces us to consider how we count degrees and how close we come to the other nature when we do.
I happen to know personally that the Prop Master made the “special effects at the end of the show” happen. Please feel free to sing her praises…